In February 2015, I sent a letter to FDOT requesting that the new Flagler Bridge design comply with new guidelines for buffered bike lanes (at a minimum). This was after a series of blog posts written by another contributor to the blog, which discussed how to make Flagler Bridge a better, safer link between the island of Palm Beach and West Palm Beach by including a protected bike lane.
In June, FDOT District 4 replied and agreed to modify the original design to accommodate buffered bike lanes on the bridge. As we reported at the time:
We appreciate your interest in the bike facilities on the Flagler Bridge project. The project team has reviewed your February 14, 2015 request and will implement the following lane configuration. A depiction is shown in the attached bridge typical section.
- Reduce the vehicle travel lanes from four-12ft lanes to four-11ft lanes. This will align with the proposed 11ft lanes east and west of the bridge. This change provides an added benefit of increased space for bicyclists near the drainage inlets that collect storm water runoff from the bridge.
- Provide a 2.5ft striped buffer between the travel lanes and bike lane.
- Provide a 6ft bike lane.
- Provide a “gutter stripe” 1.5ft from the roadway side of the barrier wall located between the bike lane and the sidewalk.
Thank you again for your continued interest in the successful completion of the Flagler Bridge project. If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact Jim Hughes, the Department’s project manager, at 954-777-4419 or via email at email@example.com.
Gerry O’Reilly, PE
District Four Secretary
Florida Department of Transportation
The new bridge just opened. Here is what the new bridge section looks like at this stage:
You might be wondering where the buffered bike lanes are. I spoke with a construction foreman at the site, and he said this is just the first phase of the bridge reopening. A second phase will restripe the bridge lanes and will include buffered bike lanes, I’m happy to report.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to all!
The Palm Beach Post reports on the bright green bike lanes that have received both praise and pushback from some residents in Delray Beach.
I made the following comment on the Delray Beach community Facebook group, Delray RAW:
As much as I’m a supporter of human powered transportation modes, I think these green painted lanes are ugly. Victor Dover in his book Street Design speaks of the importance of streets that are more than utilitarian – they should also be beautiful.
I much prefer the Dutch approach, actually putting down a red asphalt during resurfacing. It wears much better than paint and isn’t obnoxious.
…I’m not saying I would be *opposed* to this green treatment altogether if the only option. I just think it’s regrettable that we have to follow dumb standards that prescribe bright green paint, rather than something that reflects the community desire better.
The Post story suggests that there may be more leeway in the design book for colored bike lanes that fit the context of the street better. I hope that we will apply a little more creativity in the future. I’m a big fan of the Dutch approach to bike lane coloring, as described by the excellent Bicycle Dutch blog. Here is what a typical Dutch bike lane looks like after some years of use. Still easily demarcated from the road, but not so bright that it overwhelms the character of the street.
Contrast that with the bright green lanes being built in the U.S. and it feels a little bit like a case of “bikewashing”: putting in infrastructure that calls attention to itself more than necessary in order to win praise from bike advocates.
The road and bike path at Delray’s Del-Ida Park Historic District are now open to traffic — in case you haven’t already noticed. The bright green bike paths along the recently renovated roadway have captured the …
I’ll take these green lanes if no other option is available, but I wish these bike lanes would fit better into the context of the street.
Do you like these green lanes as-is or wish they were a little more understated?
[At Walkable West Palm Beach, we welcome new voices into the conversation about sustainable transportation options. Joe Roskowski is an electrical engineer and a resident of Grandview Heights. He’s a frequent bike commuter to/from downtown and an active citizen working to make West Palm Beach a better place. Here, he shares his thoughts on the proposed Fern Street bike facilities from his perspective as frequent bike commuter into downtown.]
Have you seen the new bike lane designs for Fern Street? Sadly, I have.
It’s great that the Mayor, City Commission, and citizens wish to build safe bike and pedestrian infrastructure – but more important than the wish is the design. Design matters. This is a bad design. A bad design is a dangerous design.
But there’s still time to fix it if the city acts now.
I spoke about many of these concerns in front of the City Commission and Mayor back in April 2015, when the Fern Street design presented at a “Face of the City vote” was still a work-in-progress. A follow up email was sent in May to city staff and relevant contractors detailing many of these concerns. The majority of this post is based on that email since, unfortunately, the concerns raised 8 months ago were never addressed. The plans have been approved, but it would be normal procedure for the city to submit a set of revised plans.
Note: Excerpts from the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide – the bible of bike lane design – are used below to highlight how the plan ignores modern, safe, accepted practices.
First, the city insists that Fern Street have 11-foot lanes. Any regular reader of this blog will recognize the problem. 10-foot lanes have been shown to have definitive safety benefits, while providing additional street area for other uses. West Palm Beach was featured in a nationally-read expose in The Atlantic on why cities should use 10-foot (and sometimes less) lanes. In West Palm Beach, 9- foot lanes are even used on Forest Hill Boulevard – a 5 lane undivided arterial with a high traffic volume. And yet, the city insists on 11-foot lanes, preventing safer buffers on bike lanes and forcing bike lanes to end abruptly and dangerously.
It’s important to emphasize that Jeff Speck’s article in the Atlantic specifically makes the case for 10-foot lanes in the context of higher volume urban arterials and collectors. Neighborhood streets can and should be even skinnier. From the Atlantic article:
…we are talking only about high-volume streets here. Neighborhood streets can have much narrower lanes. The classic American residential street has a 12-foot lane that handles traffic in two directions. And many busy streets in my hometown of Washington, D.C., have eight-foot lanes that function wonderfully. These are as safe and efficient as they are illegal in most of the United States, and we New Urbanists have written about them plenty before, and built more than a few. But what concerns us here are downtown streets, suburban arterials and collectors, and those other streets that are expected to handle a good amount of traffic, and are thus subject to the mandate of free flow.
Notable is that the plan section from Olive Avenue to Flagler Drive utilizes 10 foot lanes in the Fern Street plans. This is the exception that proves 10 foot lanes already work on Fern. This is the configuration Fern has had on this block for a long time. Why can’t 10 foot lanes be installed on the remainder of the section, then?
If nine foot lanes work on a formerly state designated road with 5 lanes and significant traffic volume (Forest Hill Blvd), surely we can do ten foot lanes on Fern Street, a much lower speed, lower volume urban street through downtown. Low speeds are absolutely critical to safety as well as vibrancy of the public street life. Skinnier lanes mean safer speeds.
What’s not obvious here is that the curb-to-curb width for this “skinny” section is still 40 feet wide! If best-practices were used on car lane width, there would be sufficient room to continue the bike lane. Some minor parking modifications (careful tweaking of some of striped areas lost to disconcertingly large turn-radius requirements) might be required to the plan if the goal was to ensure no loss of parking.
These are just a handful of unaddressed safety suggestions. The planned bike facilities are poorly thought out and potentially dangerous to people who will bike on Fern Street. Many of the possible fixes are inexpensive – just changing where and how much paint!
Write to your mayor, city commissioners, and planning staff to ask for safe, well-designed bike lanes on Fern Street.
Don’t miss a post! Subscribe to the Walkable West Palm Beach email list for updates on street projects and downtown development.
On the upcoming Commission meeting agenda on the 27th, the Sky Bike bikeshare system locations are set to be approved. The list is as follows:
This is going to be a tremendous asset to our downtown. Thanks to the City, DDA, and SkyBridge Capital for making this happen in West Palm Beach.